Axiom Architects have proposed a tongue-in-cheek solution to the UK parliament's Brexit deadlock, which sees the Houses of Parliament transformed into a more open forum for debate.

With the House of Commons unable to agree on a deal for the UK leaving the EU, despite numerous votes, British practice Axiom Architects has redesigned the parliamentary building to promote agreement over antagonism in politics.

Instead of the House of Lord's and House of Commons' dark debate chambers, where political parties face each other in opposition, the concept for a new Central Assembly Hall would be open, circular and flooded with natural light.

Inserting a parametric glass building with a modern debate chamber into the 19th-century Houses of Parliament, which is officially called the Palace of Westminster, would make the building more collaborative than confrontational, suggested the studio.

"We feel that our modern definition of democracy is not reflected in the current architecture of London's parliament buildings," said James Mitchell, partner at Axiom Architects, which specialises in residential and commercial developments.

"There's no doubt that the built environment affects the culture of a society, so the architecture of Westminster surely sets the tone for our nation's politics. With its nooks, crannies and antagonistic layout for debate, Westminster encourages secrecy, tension and conflict in politics," he added.

Many modern debate chambers, such as those found in buildings for the European and Scottish parliaments, use this hemicycle form, where seats are arranged in a horseshoe. Believed to have originated in Ancient Greece, the design is supposed to facilitate democratic consensus.

A transparent glass building would make the internal workings of parliament visible, symbolising transparency in democracy in much the same way as Foster + Partners' City Hall building, on the other side of the Thames.

Axiom Architects also suggested turning Big Ben's clock tower into a modern communications tool complete with digital screens that would display news about government goings-on, such as updates on the Brexit deadlock.

Victoria Tower, on the other side of the palace, would be turned into a co-working and co-living space for members of parliament and the political media. Open grounds filled with pathways would provide space for outdoor meetings or peaceful contemplation.

"We're not saying that changing the architecture of Westminster will resolve Brexit overnight, but embracing a more democratic style of architecture could help promote more productive political discourse," said Mitchell.

Inserting modern elements into the centuries-old building would help "burst the Westminster bubble", he added.

"There’s a reason people call it a bubble and we believe the architecture is part of the problem."

Current plans to refurbish the Palace of Westminster are due to begin in 2025 and are estimated to cost between £3.5 and £3.9 billion.

Inserting parametric architecture into important old buildings in London is an established trend. Foster + Partners added a curving glazed roof to the British Musuem in 2000, and John McAslan + Partners added a glazed entrance hall to King's Cross Station in 2012.